Jump to Navigation

Florida House bill would limit permanent alimony

In our previous post, we discussed a bill currently making its way through the Florida House of Representatives that would reform the way judges determine alimony in divorce cases. Specifically, the bill would limit family law judges' discretion in two ways: it would limit the amount of alimony to prevent the payer's income from becoming significantly lower than that of the payee's, and would require the judge to show that permanent alimony is the only appropriate form available before awarding it.

Our last post discussed the bill's cap on amount. This post will deal with the proposed curbing of permanent alimony.

State law changed last year to require judges to presume an award of permanent alimony to one spouse in cases where the marriage lasted more than 17 years. Before that change, the length of marriage that triggered a presumption of permanent alimony varied from county to county. The shorter the marriage lasted, the more likely the judge will award durational alimony instead, which lasts a set time not to exceed the length of the marriage itself.

Under current law, judges are not able to order durational alimony after a long-term marriage. The bill, sponsored by Rep. Kelli Stargel, R-Lakeland, would change that to make durational alimony an option. It would also require judges to show that permanent alimony is the only appropriate order in the case before awarding it. Rep. Stargel and the bill's supporters believe making permanent alimony less common will prevent excessive payments.

As with the proposed alimony cap, a number of legal experts question the permanent alimony limit. A family law professor at Stetson University in DeLand, Florida, believes that reducing the duration of alimony after a long-term marriage ends could be harmful to the couple's children. It can take time for an ex-spouse to become self-sufficient after spending years out of the workforce, the professor said, and not having alimony coming in will force the parent to stretch child support further.

The change could also make divorce more difficult. Currently, if a couple begins divorce proceedings after 17 years of marriage, the parties know that permanent alimony is nearly automatic. The bill would remove that presumption, giving the parties one more thing to fight over in court, said the chair of the Hillsborough County Bar Association's family law section.

Source: Tampa Bay Online, "Florida lawmakers consider easing alimony requirements," Elaine Silvestrini, April 4, 2011

2 Comments

Good work, but this state is in desperate need of a bill to cap child support payments. I for one am divorced, and don't mine paying child support for our daughter. Unfortunately, my ex-spouse files for more money every year to the day. Our child is utilized as a pawn for greed, and its absolutely effecting our child. Because the current system is based on percentage of overnights, my ex-wife will not extend one extra day, even if our child begs. I could guarantee if there was a cap, my daughter would be spending more time with her father.

Since being awarded permanent Alimony my ex-wife has gotten her Bachelors Degree, bought a new car and travels places that I'll never be able to go.

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Do You Have A Case?

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Lewert Law Offices, P.A. The Plaza, 5355 Town Center Road, Suite 203, Boca Raton, Florida 33486
Phone: 561-948-3419 Toll Free: 888-671-3855 Fax: 561-391-3786
Map & Directions - Contact Us Directly